J.D. at Get Rich Slowly wrote about why investors are better off to ignore financial news. He cites a Harvard study that says:
Investors who received no news performed better than those who received a constant stream of information, good or bad. In fact, among investors who were trading [a volatile stock], those who remained in the dark earned more than twice as much money as those whose trades were influenced by the media.
He concludes that:
The daily fluctuations of the stock market are especially meaningless to me. I’m still learning the basics of saving and investing. I get more from reading the words of Warren Buffett or devouring books like The Four Pillars of Investing than I do from watching talking heads speculate on why Apple’s stock price fell.
Here’s my spin:
Like any good business, the financial press has one overarching goal: earn money.
They earn money by getting you to read their magazine, watch their show, or visit their website. With few exceptions, they aren’t concerned whether their product makes you a better investor. Making you a better investor isn’t their primary goal. Making you a better investor doesn’t help them earn money.
The financial press is composed of journalists and entertainers, not investors. Those that are investors are compensated with money or brand enhancement to appear on the show or write the column. They’re not doing it out of the goodness of their heart.
I’m not saying they’re dishonest. And I’m not saying they’re incompetent. Not all of them. But you should understand where they’re coming from. They say things because they’re paid to say things, not because they have important things to say.
Let’s use Jim Cramer as an example. He makes a tremendous amount of money doing what he does. And what does he do? He’s not really an investor. He’s an entertainer. He was an investor earlier in his life. But now he’s an entertainer.
Does that mean you shouldn’t trust his advice? Just because he’s an entertainer? Let’s put it this way. I only have so much time in my life to absorb financial information. I’d rather spend it reading books and articles with good, solid investing analysis. I don’t want investing advice from someone who comes up with things to say only because he’s got a half hour to fill every night.
There are many well-meaning journalists that produce good advice. But there is also a lot of bad advice out there. Learn to know the difference so you can ignore the latter.
Hey Jeff, couldn’t agree more with your post. I just wish I could get a few more people to not watch the financial news — be rid of a few more of those knee-jerk reactions that the news then capitalizes on. It’s a vicious cycle for sure.